- New figures show thousands in England referred to children’s services repeatedly before action taken on issues like abuse, neglect and family dysfunction.
- Action for Children highlights one shocking case of young boy living in filthy conditions on a diet of crisps and sausage rolls, after opportunities to offer early help were missed.
- Charity warns chances to intervene early and prevent harm to children missed year after year as councils put in ‘impossible position’ with falling budgets and rising demands.
A six-year-old boy living in squalor, surviving on crisps and sausage rolls, and unable to function or communicate with other children at school, was let down multiple times, a shocking new report highlights today.
Despite repeated referrals from the local health visitor team in his early years, as well as the charity Action for Children and the boy’s school, the cash-strapped council missed a number of opportunities to offer early help and to take him into care at an earlier stage before the family reached crisis point.
Alarming new research from the charity reveals this could be one extreme case out of tens of thousands of vulnerable children in England being repeatedly let down, as severe cuts force councils to scale down their services.
An analysis of child referrals to social services by teachers, police or health professionals over two years revealed as many as 36,000 children were re-referred back to these services, when they didn’t get help the first time.
Despite being re-referred, more than a third – over 13,500 children – had no statutory support from social services over the two-year period. And previous Action for Children research shows many of these children are likely to be left struggling with no support at all.
With the vast majority of children referred for serious concerns such as abuse and neglect (51%) or family dysfunction (22%), the charity is warning that councils crippled by government cuts can’t provide early support which tackles the root causes of family problems and prevents children from coming to harm.
Central Government has cut funding for children services by nearly a quarter since 2010, with funding for council early help services set to fall again by nearly a third by 2020.
Imran Hussain, Action for Children’s policy and campaigns director, said:
“It’s simply horrifying that thousands of children are being left to face the potential risk of abuse or neglect, not just once but again and again.
“Every day at Action for Children we see the heart-breaking results of families suffering at the hands of domestic abuse, neglect, or drug addiction – these are scars that stay with children for the rest of their lives. But we know things can turn out differently if councils are able to step in with early help to stop these problems spiralling out of control.
“Councils are being put in an impossible position and children are stuck in a revolving door – repeatedly referred to children’s services but only getting help when problems reach crisis point. The government must urgently put an end to the punishing funding cuts which give councils no option but to drastically shrink children’s support services. Otherwise more and more vulnerable children will be left at potential risk and without the early help they desperately need.”
An Action for Children family support worker described the uphill battle she had in getting help from social care for a child in desperate need of support, after opportunities for early intervention had been missed:
“Last year, a mum with learning difficulties and her six-year-old son were referred to us by his school for intensive family support. Until then, the only professionals to have seen the family were the local health visitor team who had run their concerns past children’s services several times, but no action was taken to offer early help to the family. Without parenting support in place, the alarm was raised again when the boy was at school, but he still didn’t get any help from children’s services.
“When we visited the family home it was filthy and smelly with barely any furnishings. The only comfort in the boy’s room was an old cushion which looked like a sack of potatoes and had never been washed. It was clear he had had no stability or routine.
“At around six stone, he was twice the weight he should have been for his age and we discovered he was typically eating sausage rolls for breakfast, a whole tube of Pringles crisps at morning break-time and fried chicken take-away for tea most nights.
“As well as always turning up dirty to school, he couldn’t function in the classroom or communicate with other children and would often make strange noises or start screaming.
“We immediately began visiting two or three times a week to offer an intensive programme of parenting support – with a particular focus on healthy eating. And we contacted children’s social care to make an urgent referral into child protection.
“The young boy has now been taken into long-term foster care and has made significant progress; his behaviour in school has settled to the extent that he is now in the classroom full-time and he has lost a lot of weight.
“Early opportunities were missed to help him and his family a number of times when the alarm was raised. Sadly, the system failed him.”
– The case study is anonymous to protect identities